<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are All &#8220;800&#8243; Numbers Treated Equal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.engineready.com/are-all-800-numbers-treated-equal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.engineready.com/are-all-800-numbers-treated-equal/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=are-all-800-numbers-treated-equal</link>
	<description>Search Engine Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:51:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 800 Numbers</title>
		<link>http://blog.engineready.com/are-all-800-numbers-treated-equal/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>800 Numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.engineready.com/?p=277#comment-575</guid>
		<description>intriguing question. thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>intriguing question. thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 800 Numbers</title>
		<link>http://blog.engineready.com/are-all-800-numbers-treated-equal/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>800 Numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.engineready.com/?p=277#comment-574</guid>
		<description>nice post. you pose a very interesting question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice post. you pose a very interesting question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Lewis</title>
		<link>http://blog.engineready.com/are-all-800-numbers-treated-equal/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.engineready.com/?p=277#comment-567</guid>
		<description>Great question Rich. We have the data to compute average call length, but didn&#039;t include that in our study. If we do a follow-up study, we&#039;ll definitely include call lengths in our results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question Rich. We have the data to compute average call length, but didn&#8217;t include that in our study. If we do a follow-up study, we&#8217;ll definitely include call lengths in our results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Rosen, FastCall411</title>
		<link>http://blog.engineready.com/are-all-800-numbers-treated-equal/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Rosen, FastCall411</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.engineready.com/?p=277#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Brian - Interesting report. How did the average call lengths compare in the study? I&#039;ve been told that 800#s generate lots of wrong numbers (after 40 years in circulation).

PS I notice you guys use an 888 on your site ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian &#8211; Interesting report. How did the average call lengths compare in the study? I&#8217;ve been told that 800#s generate lots of wrong numbers (after 40 years in circulation).</p>
<p>PS I notice you guys use an 888 on your site ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

